No pearls of wisdom from trad today.:sad2:
Must be recovering from the Monday Club.![]()
They started posting at 3.48 am Monday, maybe they're tired.
No pearls of wisdom from trad today.:sad2:
Must be recovering from the Monday Club.![]()
Personally I would like to thank all contributors to this thread as you have made my Wednesday morning commute very humorous.
While trade bodies on the whole are a good thing if you get value for money, my issue with the NASC is they only loosely recognise the contribution of designers. If we really want we can become 'info members' for a fee but are then not even allowed to use the logo to demonstrate affiliation.
I would like to have seen them set up a parallel members list of 'approved' designers then clearly paying the fee, and assuming we would pass the audit, would be of value especially if the MCG insisted on 'approved' designers. As it stands, I don't see much value in it. We currently have the position where NASC members can still present the cheapest most inappropriate design which kind of undermines the point of being an NASC member?
you are wasted at this game AOM
THE DIPLOMATIC CORE IS SCREAMING OUT FOR YOU
all kidding aside a very good and reasoned post and the correct use of expolate should only be commended![]()
Not sure about that Tom being honest. The thing that got me when reading most of the posts though was, phone the nasc see what they say. I have met a few of them, and one guy in particular is very helpful, just call them and ask they would be only too glad to speak to you.
Hi AOM,we have not responded anymore on the NASC post as we stated our opinion about the benefits that brings us as members of the NASC and our views remain unaltered but we obviously now fully understand why a lot of Forum members believe otherwise.I think that they have given up happy, which is just another reason why they will be largely ignored or not taken too seriously by most on here.
How's that for diplomacy.![]()