TomP
Well-known member
Sorry, I didn't mean me but scaffolding in general, there are companies which have no idea of the guidance published or even the Work at Height Regs. Would it not be better to try to involve these companies at a lower level and bring them on; kind of a badgers, cubs and scouts thing?
The guidance costs which I understand as it has to be written, published and then sent out.
With regard to joining, it's a considerable fee which if you fail a couple of times in my eyes becomes un-realistic, no body wants to keep shelling out money.
It's the scaffold firms like ours which try but can't afford to join or at present implement all the requirements needed because we just don't have the funds to put everything right, as I'm sure you agree, these things take time.
It's all or nothing with the lower end of the scaffold companies not being consulted or even being able to give their opinion, It will be hard to change smaller companies minds about NASC when they will have no input.
The guidance costs which I understand as it has to be written, published and then sent out.
With regard to joining, it's a considerable fee which if you fail a couple of times in my eyes becomes un-realistic, no body wants to keep shelling out money.
It's the scaffold firms like ours which try but can't afford to join or at present implement all the requirements needed because we just don't have the funds to put everything right, as I'm sure you agree, these things take time.
It's all or nothing with the lower end of the scaffold companies not being consulted or even being able to give their opinion, It will be hard to change smaller companies minds about NASC when they will have no input.