Regulation, an aid for scaffold safety

TEESSIDE SCAFFOLDER

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
9,220
Reaction score
3
Location
TEESSIDE
Regulation, an aid for scaffold safety

Written by Maria Hadlow - 05 Sep 2011


The changes to UK scaffolding regulations, which occurred at the end of 2010, could help prevent accidents, but only if they are properly followed and enforced, warns Chris Nix, UK sales manager at Scafftag.

The UK's HSE (Health and Safety Executive) recently released figures which indicate that the construction industry is the industrial sector in which the highest number of fatalities occurs. Although numbers are decreasing year on year, 42 people in the UK died in the period 2009/10.

To support the progression of safety within the construction sector and despite recent cuts in funding, the HSE has pledged to conduct unannounced inspections on construction sites over the forthcoming months in a bid to try to reduce the numbers of accidents as well as reinstate the importance of companies being compliant.

In addition there have been several changes in legislation since 2005 affecting the scaffolding industry in order to make construction sites a safer place to work. In late 2010 the British Standards Institution (BSI) formally withdrew BS 5793 and replaced it with the European standard BS EN12811/1, which applies to all scaffolding, from the most basic to the most complex of structures, although primarily based on system structures.

BSEN12811/1 specifies six load classifications for prefabricated structures as well as guidance on materials and weathers. The TG20:08 has also been issued as a technical industry guidance document, based on BS EN12811/1 but addressing specific issues when using tube and fitting scaffolds and is available in two volumes.

Volume 1 specifies the four basic scaffolds for which no specific design is required, plus guidance on erection and dismantling, use and inspection. Volume 2 gives technical information and advice required for the design of scaffolds outside the range of Volume 1.

Although the basic principles of BS5793 remain, the scope is wider and both volumes are essential in understanding the key changes following its withdrawal. The BSEN12811/1 for temporary prefabricated scaffold structures differs from BS5793 in that:



There are now six service load classes, some with partial area loads
Seven width classes
Two headroom classes
There is a requirement for a minimum unimpeded area along the full length of the working platform
BS 5793 did not differentiate between loading on the main platform and the inside boards
The definition of a scaffold classified as 'in service' and 'out of service' has been changed
Wind loads on scaffolds must conform to BS 6399/EN1991

These changes crucially affect everyone who is involved in the design, erection and inspection of scaffolding structures, namely scaffolding companies, scaffolding design companies, major construction companies and scaffold inspection houses.

There are many implications with the changes, such as BS EN12811 now covering scaffolds erected in Scotland whereas the BS5973 did not. To ensure maximum safety, unless a scaffold is a basic configuration described in a recognised guidance publication such as NASC Technical Guidance TG20 or the manufacturer's guidance for system scaffolds, the scaffold should be designed by calculation, by a competent person, to ensure it will have adequate strength and stability.

All scaffolding should also be erected, dismantled and altered in accordance with either NASC guidance document SG4 for tube and fitting scaffolds or the manufacturer's erection guide for system scaffolds. For scaffolds that fall outside the scope of 'Basic Scaffolds' as described in TG:20:08 Volume 1, the design information should describe the sequence and methods to be adopted when erecting, dismantling and altering the scaffold.

Scafftag products are designed to help in the management of equipment. In order to help those using scaffolding decipher whether a structure is safe or not, Scafftag has designed a range of inserts specific to either BS EN12811/1 or TG20. The system clearly identifies the key information such as loadings, records of ongoing inspection, ownership details and any potential hazards within the structure.

"Whilst a visual tagging system isn't a legal requirement," says Mr Nix many engineers have recognised the benefits of using such a system and adopted it as a solution to aid the safety inspection process, which is a requirement under law.

"As a result of a combination of changes to the scaffolding regulations together with Scafftags being used more extensively, workplace safety is improving."
 
42 people in the UK died in the period 2009/10.

We keep getting these statistics flung at us every time some one talks about our trade. Exactly how many were fall's from height involving Scaffold erected by scaffolders is another matter.
 
42 people in the UK died in the period 2009/10.

We keep getting these statistics flung at us every time some one talks about our trade. Exactly how many were fall's from height involving Scaffold erected by scaffolders is another matter.

Ya.

Out of that 42 id bet less then 10% were Scaffolders.
I bet most were kids - YTS painters and such, who wasn't even supposed to be on the Scaffold, as it wasn't ready or they were working unsafe whilst on a completed Scaffold.

But its us who seem to get the blame still... :wondering:

Scaffolders dont fall anyway. - They call it 'controlled' descent. :blink1:
 
the only basepates ive got are lazy scaffs:eek:

Lazy?
How comes they call me 'Jay the Baseplate'?

I thought its was because i was rock-solid and look like a square metal plate? :eek:h:
 
I know any loss of life is bad , but 42 lives lost in construction in my eyes is not a lot really when you consider how many people work in the sector, the types of projects under taken, the weather and total unpredictability that working in the natural enviroment brings plus other factors ,
 
Damn lies and statistics. There is a danger of sticking your head in the sand and not learning from past mistakes but until someone comes out and gives us the stats for the industry as a whole they will always be blowing smoke.

---------- Post added at 06:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:39 PM ----------

I know any loss of life is bad , but 42 lives lost in construction in my eyes is not a lot really when you consider how many people work in the sector, the types of projects under taken, the weather and total unpredictability that working in the natural enviroment brings plus other factors ,

Not sure about that one Superscaff. If you look behind that number there will be a lot of heart broken relatives, a bit idealistic I know but I would have thought that most of them were avoidable. I am also aware of people in glass houses, as I'm sending men out to do what is meant to be a high risk activity but I think with all the safety measures in place that we all moan about we will manage to keep of the statisticians page.
 
I bet more then 42 people die, due to jumping in front of trains, then working at height.

Ofcourse, if you jump in front of a train, you cant sue the train company for millions of pounds due to 'neglect' as you can a Building contractor or Scaffolding contractor.

Thats the REAL reason Health and Safety exists.
To cover the arses of the Construction firms - Not to protect us, the average worker.
 
I know you all are right but I will say this, how many times have you hit or cut yourself a sore one and immediately thought to yourself what a thicko why the hell did I do it like that as it's just not worth it.
 
All kicked off with the claim culture we've got.
Didn't used to bother about harnesses and glasses etc back in the day.
Course more people were injured like !!!
oh..... errrrrm :)
 
14 years scaffolding, various companies, numerous sites, loads of different scaffs, harnesses on, sometimes not on, lots of times not clipped on, never seen one slip or fall, or had to be rescued, dont know whether just been lucky, or more to the point we are a bit more professional than most of the suits gives us credit for, cause lets be honest, most treat you as thou you are still at school, and half of them have just finished school, or that most falls from heights are other trades that cant climb a ladder, or the common one a shifter in hand has removed handrail.:notrust:
 
Damn lies and statistics. There is a danger of sticking your head in the sand and not learning from past mistakes but until someone comes out and gives us the stats for the industry as a whole they will always be blowing smoke.

---------- Post added at 06:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:39 PM ----------



Not sure about that one Superscaff. If you look behind that number there will be a lot of heart broken relatives, a bit idealistic I know but I would have thought that most of them were avoidable. I am also aware of people in glass houses, as I'm sending men out to do what is meant to be a high risk activity but I think with all the safety measures in place that we all moan about we will manage to keep of the statisticians page.

i did say all deaths were bad , but its impossible to do what we do in an uncontrolable enviroment without casualties im afraid , and yes chances are most deaths were avoidable, if you compared number of hours worked or something and compared it to other ways in getting killed i would expect construction would have a very low ratio, IE million hours per death or something
 
Extra Health and Safety dont do anything to prevent accidents.
Accidents are exactly what they are - Unavoidable.

No one wants to get hurt, but its the nature of the job.
Its hard, dirty and dangerous...

No amount of gloves/glasses will prevent an accident.
 
I know your right especially about the millions of man hours and I'm not trying to kid you on I'm perfect but if it was your father or brother you wouldn't swap a life for a miserable job. I'm not trying to imply you would even for a stranger I'm just trying to say it is someone's relation and definitely not worth it.

Anyway, my point was that out of all these accidents and incidents there is no real proof that properly erected scaffold by properly trained and ticketed men was ever involved in any of these deaths and until there is I still say they are blowing smoke and hitting the wrong trade.
 
I've seen a couple of lads fall but not seriously hurt. I've heard horror stories from lads working in 60's/70's. Harnesses would have stopped the falls but like you say only if they're clipped on.
I actually think wearing a harness could possibly make you more careless about your safety
 
Getting so bad with ladders at the moment, where i am that 2 lift towers, kicker lift and 2 metre boarded lift, 13 ft ladder on it, 6 foot from the edge of a handrailed roof, with a gate, a coral at the top, is now being boxed in all the way down. for fu**s sake cant people climb a 1 in 4 ladder anymore, if HSE have there way everything will have staircases on.:wondering:
 
I did say that a few months back and to be honest the clamber for stair treads have already started here but Ken Cain assures me I am wide of the mark but I still have my suspicions.
 
Top Bottom