benjo0211
Well-known member
Which is the best union to be with I was with ucatt about 7 years ago but not been in one for a while any recommendations??
I take it from your response you're one of those people who would need a Union to fight your corner then? . I've been in two unions, once in the mid 1980's once in the mid 1990's both took my money, both let me down. Sorry if that makes me a w"nker and a fu**in half wit in your book, but to be honest looking at your join date on the forum and your amount of posts, who really cares what you think Jr member , you've probably got a junior member too !!!!No wonder the industries the state it's in with W*****s like you ya fu**in half wit !!!!!
What A Lot Of Pish, Iv Been A Member Of Ucatt For Thirty Odd Years, And Being 100% Honest They Have Never Done Me A Bad Deal, Without Trade Unions There Wopuld Be No Holiday Pay , Sick Pay Or Health And Safety Legislation And For Scaffolders To Say Anything Else Really Pisses Me Off, To Think That Men Who Do The Same Job As Me Think Like That Says It All About The North South Divide, Being A Member Of A Trade Union Means That You Think About Others Not Just Yourself Its About Caring About Your And Others Conditions, Its Not About Going Out On Strike (I Have Never Ever Thought About Going Out On Strike) But I Would Never Cross Any Picket Line Either. So Its Agree To Disagree Folks Because I Will Never Be Persuaded Otherwise.
do not cross the picket line and if your not a member fuk off yam and dont come back getting on off other lads backs who have gone with out food to mouth to get the wages conditions we have to day is bang out of order. me street scaff been a member of the union about 2 or 3 year wont need them on the street but its a contribution in sector i will be going in to ie offshore industrial and if your on them jobs and not in a union like i say fek off home and dont come back in my eyes
Fair play for your views, mate.
Just a question though; why do you need to be in a union to think about the welfare of others and taking a stance on poor conditions?
---------- Post added at 07:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:17 PM ----------
That's hardly democracy, Marra.
What about a mans right to work?
its ok thinking about it but thinking isnt going to make it happen 1 man can try and will faill 100's pr 1,000's may susceed that my firedn is the union
Fair play for your views, mate.
Just a question though; why do you need to be in a union to think about the welfare of others and taking a stance on poor conditions?
---------- Post added at 07:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:17 PM ----------
That's hardly democracy, Marra.
What about a mans right to work?
marra,a scab because he is not paying the union???its his choice you have no right to call any man a scab because hes not in the union!its that caveman attitude that gets us nowhere,scab if he crosses a picket line yes i grant you that but scab because hes not in the union?deluded!
marra,a scab because he is not paying the union???its his choice you have no right to call any man a scab because hes not in the union!its that caveman attitude that gets us nowhere,scab if he crosses a picket line yes i grant you that but scab because hes not in the union?deluded!
Here is a scenario I've seen many times.
You are working in the offshore industry, and are a fully paid up union member and some of your colleagues are all working 3 weeks on and 1 off when there are competent men struggling to get a week offshore/sat in the house/paid off.
what choice would you you make ?
Would you accept the offer of a 3 weeker ( an extra week on your 2 week trip organised while offshore ) knowing there are lads at home ?
If so it seems a little hypocritical in my opinion.