It's not the TG:thingy that governs design; that's covered by the current standards. The TG's are like the old ACoPs and approved docuents used to be, as in, if your job is within the documents scope then Building Control would not require you to consult with an Engineer. If only they'd thought a bit harder about what they were doing before they published it.
Morning Nick,
100% correct. TG20 was a poorly conceived and poorly produced attempt to re produce a 5973 type document. It all went horribly wrong.
That said I do remember the introduction of 5973 and having most of the same conversations then!!
regards
Alan
We don't like change round these parts. :nuts:
If they had have included some decent worked examples that chaps could print and take to site it may have avoided a lot of confusion from the inspectors.
The other option of course, would be to make sure the inspectors have some sort of construction qualification (similar to Building Control) so they at least speaking the same language (or as good as) as the chaps on site.