philliosmaximus
Moderator
Good for you aom mate
Celticbhoy, Just gave a thanks to help ya catch up, lol.your moving the goal posts now,i dont think i have any thanks?when im off line my mrs will be posting so if things get bit odd then youl know it is she and not me..............remember this festive time take a couple of minutes out to whisper those three little words to her...............IM AWAY OOT.
---------- Post added at 07:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:34 PM ----------
the council certinly isnt private profit driven????and it is them in question of whom we speak my friend.
I seem to remember seeing a video online about NASC bring out a standardised form for Street Permits which they have pitched to all councils to incorporate so as to standardise it across the country. Maybe this is what was meant?
It was mooted but was thought prudent to re-word it. Before I am savaged, bare in mind that this comes after a few accidents and councils realised they were getting dragged into compensation claims. I know there are plenty good firms out there without membership but I think this was one way for the councils to prove they had taken reasonable steps to prove only competent firms were erecting over busy city centres.
Here's a link to a thread from earlier this year disguising the http://www.scaffoldersforum.com/sca...ement-licence.html?highlight=pavement+licence as proposed by NASCtheres another thread regarding that on here somewhere , the form can also be downloaded from NASC website
My local council is insisting on CHAS membership for all contractors after jan 1st. Not insisting NASC tho. I have been thinking that I would like to start aiming for nasc membership but I am a 1gang firm at mo and I'm happy like that. The main reason is because even though I hold all insurances and I'm 100% legal I feel the size of my my firm makes me look cowboyish without some sort of trade recognision. I have been Reading about sccr and have membership form but don't know cost.
thanks brandy gentleman,in fact your all gentlemen its good to have a discussion with guys who have been there and not just listened to the tales,love it.ps a colud do with some thanks as supers got me whacked on this one.
---------- Post added at 11:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:44 PM ----------
i think the nasc could be far more inclusive than it presently is,even bringing in a tiered membership then far more companys could then come under the auspices of the nasc,while trying to achive full status.as it is just now it seems like a private club i dont think it would be a good idea to give them control of issueing any sort of permit in their current form.