seeing as an NVQ has always existed for scaffold inspection. why has it never been offered to learners?
surely a learner goes to attend a course to be educated. they undertake NVQ as part of the training and these rules are set out by our government. i already know thats illegal to disadvantage a learner. So WHY are scaffolders undertaking inspection being disadvantaged? Or is this a simple case of being mis-sold something. Now how much did the banks have to payout for mis-selling PP I insurance.
maybe every person who in the past or present actually has a case on this.
i do need to check on if your case would be against the training provider or not. however the training provider has only fulfilled their oblegations under the scheme.
the more i look at this claims via CiSRS / NASC London Address via registered post.
maybe any legal boffs on the site could advise further. Please dont tell me its not viable when it is. who do we sue CISRS or the training provider?
surely a learner goes to attend a course to be educated. they undertake NVQ as part of the training and these rules are set out by our government. i already know thats illegal to disadvantage a learner. So WHY are scaffolders undertaking inspection being disadvantaged? Or is this a simple case of being mis-sold something. Now how much did the banks have to payout for mis-selling PP I insurance.
maybe every person who in the past or present actually has a case on this.
i do need to check on if your case would be against the training provider or not. however the training provider has only fulfilled their oblegations under the scheme.
the more i look at this claims via CiSRS / NASC London Address via registered post.
maybe any legal boffs on the site could advise further. Please dont tell me its not viable when it is. who do we sue CISRS or the training provider?