Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009 may say different if your scheme is refusing to recognise bona fide NVQ qualifications simply because they have been awarded by a body other than Cskills .
The CISRS recognises the NVQ -it is a fundamental part of their entry criteria. They just won't issue a card confirming accreditation unless you meet
all specified criteria, as discussed ad nauseum elsewhere the forum.
There is a pile of negativity on here about CISRS and I think it is misdirected. Surely it's
easily the best competence scheme for Scaffolders in the UK?! It does all the things I would associate with proving competence and requires proof of training and experience. I accept it's not perfect, but from a health and safety stand point there is no question whatsoever that it's the best competence scheme there is for Scaffolders in the UK, if not the world.
I understand that it must be very frustrating to be in the position that some of the fellas on here are finding themselves in, i.e. a lifetime in the industry and being told that the cards on which they had previously relied are no longer valid. However, why not direct the frustration at the companies that failed to train you during that lifetime? Why not direct it at the ECITB, who, in my opinion have hung you all out to dry? The CISRS are not the villain of the piece, they operate a scheme that serves tens of thousands of Scaffolders very well and it does likewise for member companies of the UKCG, who
choose to adopt the CISRS scheme as their preferred method of ensuring competence.
I got an ECITB card stating I was a Scaffolder after 6 months in the yard, when I didn't know a sleeve from a ledger. Fortunately, (or unfortunately - depending on your view) the ECITB card was never really fully accepted in this area (North West), so local employers fully endorsed the old CITB scheme. This usually meant being sent to Bircham Newton (or latterly one of the local CITB Centres) and going there set me up for a career in the industry.
I now work in health and safety (primarily in scaffolding, but in other areas too) and spend large parts of my time discussing competence. Putting aside my knowledge & experience of scaffolding (25 years or so) and speaking purely from a health and safety professional's viewpoint, there is no way the ECITB scheme can be compared to that operated by the CISRS.
I appreciate that there are probably hundreds, if not thousands of perfectly capable Scaffolders registered on the ECITB scheme, but don't see how it is then fault of the CISRS that those same people don't meet their entry criteria or why they should change their own entry requirements because your own scheme has let you down.