Construction worker died when scaffolding pole fell on his head

TEESSIDE SCAFFOLDER

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
9,220
Reaction score
3
Location
TEESSIDE
Construction worker died when scaffolding pole fell on his head

by Ben Bloom and 
Sarah Ingrams, Reporters
Thursday, March 1, 2012
9:50 AM



A construction worker was killed on his cigarette break when a pole fell from one of the largest scaffolding structures in Europe and hit him on the head.


CommentsEmailPrintGot a story?..To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.
..
Anton Dochev, 54, was sitting in the smoking area of the £100million pound Grade II listed Lancasters development in Bayswater on August 6, 2010, while part of the scaffolding was being dismantled above him.

An inquest at Westminster Coroner’s Court this week heard that the location of the smoking area and its lack of a protective cover had been repeatedly raised with site management.

Health and safety manager Paul James, who left the project a couple of months before Mr Dochev’s death, said the smoking area was in the wrong place and a failure to close it was “gross mismanagement”.

He said: “If I was on site at that time I would have closed off the whole of that area until the dismantling was finished.”

Scaffolding supervisor Anthony Crow agreed, saying: “To put a smoking area under scaffolding, which is a busy site and is being dismantled, is not a good idea.”

He said he had regularly raised the issue at formal health and safety meetings, but the “concerns fell on deaf ears”.

On the day of the tragedy, two “vastly experienced” scaffolders were sent up the “enormous structure” to dismantle a section of redundant scaffolding, the court heard.

One of them undid a clip attached to the scaffolding pole, which then “went like a bullet”, ricocheted off another section and fell to the floor “like a ballistic missile”.

Site safety manager Paul Westie told the court the smoking area was moved after the accident because “it was disrespectful to the deceased to keep it there and the site had moved on and the area needed to be opened up for construction”.

But he claimed precautions at the time of Mr Dochev’s death were “reasonable and appropriate”.

Construction manager Timothy Hawkins said he totally disagreed with the criticism and had “no issue” with the location of the smoking area.

Health and Safety Executive inspector Andrew East, who was brought in to independently review the site after the incident, told the court the incident “could not have been reasonably foreseen”.

He added: “If I had been there before the accident I do not think I would have said there was a problem.”

Summing up, coroner Fiona Wilcox said: “No conclusion was reached whether the deceased was wearing PPE (personal protective equipment). PPE was required in the smoking area, however it would not have prevented the fatality.”.

She added: “A risk of falling objects in the smoking area was identified and communicated prior to the accident. Alternative options included moving the smoking area, covering it with protective measures, or closing it off during scaffolding work but no action was taken.”

The cause of death was given as an accident
 
Every ba5tard passing the book again, another fuck1ng cover up by the top brass trying to save on paying out for the lads death
 
"They've since moved the smoking area as it was disrespectful to the deceased to keep it there. "

And fecking dangerous.
 
More madness,channelling men into smoking areas like cattle. Health and saftey indirectly put him in a place of danger. Marvelous. RIP Anton Dochev
 
This just sums up the situation out there, the principle contractors believe that if they put all the responsibility of H&S on the sub-contractor they are doing everything possible to improve safety on their sites. They dont give damn if the ridiculous measures they impose on the subby virtually stops them from working to a pace they need to earn a profit, as long as it doesnt affect theirs. How many times have you told the PC that the area below a scaffold in dismantle must be completely blocked off and no person to be underneath. And the answer is always our schedule does not allow that, and it is your responsibility not to drop anything. Well i hope this company gets the book thrown at them, how long would have taken to replace the smoking shed, but they were probably all too busy checking the subbys method statements to see if it met their high standards.
 
Good question hswt, just a percentage thing I guess. Tons of gear moved every working day. Still, for management not to recognise the dangers.???


Well said Poledancer.
 
Last edited:
Good question hswt, just a percentage thing I guess. Tons of gear moved every working day. Still, for management not to recognise the dangers.???

Yes tons of gear moved every day, but its the bit about the clip being undone and the tube falling that worries me.
Anyone can accidentally drop gear while manhandling loads of it but to undo a clip and let a tube fall isnt what a vastly experienced hand should be doing. Sounds like inexperience to me but it could be poor reporting by the press.
Of course management should have recognised the dangers.
 
there was a time on sites where everbody knew the unwritten rule - you don't work underneath anyone. It seems the drive for greed and profit has overridden this and as has been pointed out, the gaffers are just buck passing. no doubt there was some company "safety advisor" wandering round making sure everybody had their glasses on while ignoring the safety of those in the smoking area!
 
Health and Safety Executive inspector Andrew East, who was brought in to independently review the site after the incident, told the court the incident “could not have been reasonably foreseen”.

Is it so bad that an HSE inspector could not imagine someone might drop a tube? Therefore congregating smokers below may not be a good idea. One of the first rules I ever learnt was 'they don't work below you, or you don't work above them'.

Total negligence supported by an inspector!!
 
It seems odd that experienced scaffs somehow failed to stop a tube falling but that is why people don't work under others, there is still every chance that it can happen. How many times have you undone a tube for it to start to go because some d*ck has undone the other end to move it and not done it back up?

Sad that this happened, not convinced it was unavoidable.....
 
Health and Safety Executive inspector Andrew East, who was brought in to independently review the site after the incident, told the court the incident “could not have been reasonably foreseen”.

He added: “If I had been there before the accident I do not think I would have said there was a problem.”

.
I bet he'd have foreseen it if his desk was directly below instead of the smoke shelter
 
as long as you've got your hi-vi, glasses, gloves, boots and hat on, these ******* don't care about anything else!
 
im in swansea now... my tools r in cardiff... wheres the work??
 
Top Bottom