Wow cisrs actually steal peoples material for financial gain

pud

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Location
warrington
This has just been posted on the who actually put the cisrs inspection course together.

quoted from kevin34.
Just to add some more talking points.

Regarding Inspectors, it is agreed by everyone, and stipulated by HSA etc, that they must be competent so I have a few questions, and answers.
Do the people who complete a inspection training course prove competency ?
Answer: No they do not.
Do the trainers/centre/CISRS certificate them as competent ?
Answer: No they do not.
Who can prove they are competent to inspect a scaffold ?
Answer: Scaffolders.
Is it possible to design a scaffold without scaffolding background or experience ?
Answer: Yes it is.

It cannot make sense to say I must complete a minimum of 18 months training and experience to be recognised a Scaffolder but only 2 days to be recognised as a Inspector who can overule and instruct, directly or indirectly, the Scaffolder to alter a scaffold.

There is a competency unit available for inspection of scaffold within the UK NVQ system although this is seldom used. I have experience of this with a company named Safety and Access in Nottingham who, it must be said, showed a good foresight in trying to implement this award.

While looking at the earlier threads it is clear that there are some poorly informed people who may be responsible for inspection of scaffolding and a good example is where BS EN is quoted as being, "Legislation", when, it is not. BS EN is a "Code Of Practice". This type of understanding does contribute to problems at work where people constantly quote these codes of practice as legally binding. Example: My son, a Scaffolder was informed by a safety advisor that he, and his company, "MUST", use the Scaffolder's Step to install scaffolding.

Within the 2 Day Basic Scaffold Inspection training an Instructor must attempt to teach and assess;
Course and centre induction.
HASAWA
WAHR
Relevant Regs
ACOPS (There are none as these have a special place in law and do not include any for Scaffolding)
Scaffold Terminology
Scaffold Materials
Means of Access
Gin Wheels and Ropes (Should be Means of Lifting and Lowering Equipment)
Scaffold Ties
Construction Regulations (Think should be CDM Regulations now)
Recommendations for Basic Scaffolds.
Practical Inspection
Reports

This should cover the following scaffold structures;
Independent
Putlog
Birdcage
Tower
Scaffold with Beams
Protection Fans
Pavement Gantry
Loading Bay
Roof Saddle
Splay Scaffold
Roof Edge Protection
Trussout Scaffold.

Think most would agree that this means a lot of the content is only, "glossed over", and, in no way, could anyone be looked upon as Competent on completion.

Sorry this is such a long post but one more point.

Regarding the actual presentation. Any organisation who wishes to conduct a CISRS inspection training course MUST purchase this presentation and lesson plans etc for a cost of 750 for the basic and 500 for the advanced.
Whether the presentation is good or not is a matter of opinion but forcing someone to buy this when they find it unacceptable quality is wrong and seems to prove the point of Ragscaff and others that making money is more important than quality training and safety.

Sorry, one more point.
A substantial part of this presentation is copied from various sources who have provided this free of charge provided they receive proper recognition.
Some of the content was offered previously for a fee and CISRS refused the offer obviously preferring to obtain it without payment.

What does that say about CISRS ?
This is why we need organisations like SCCR. Please support them as they are the only hope.
There are far too many self serving people and organisations involved in the construction industry and it's time the people who do the work had a say.

Congratulations to all on this forum for speaking your mind and keeping us informed. Best of luck to SCCR for the future and keep up the great work.
 
Wow!!!

I wonder what response (if any) the CISRS will give us, maybe one of the scheme owners could reply.
 
wonder what Simians offical statement to all this is. after all they and Dave Mosley only sing from there songsheet. Its time for an offical statement from mr mosley by the look of things. My money is on him keeping very quiet and hoping this will blow over.
This will not go away so stand up like a man and give your account of your actions Mr Mosley.
 
Last edited:
wonder what Simians offical statement to all this is. after all they and Dave Mosley only sing from there songsheet. Its time for an offical statement from mr mosley by the look of things. My money is on him keeping very quiet and hoping this will blow over.
This will not go away so stand up like a man and give your account of your actions Mr Mosley.

As an independent training provider we are unaware of any of the issues above I would direct this to the scheme manager we only work to the scheme.
 
SCCR has requested a couple, trying again now!

Stewart
 
Disgusting that other peoples hard work is being ripped off. I hear a number of people have had a hand in taking his work.


WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE
 
Top Bottom