Scaffold boss fined for fall that happened on his watch

TEESSIDE SCAFFOLDER

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
9,220
Reaction score
3
Location
TEESSIDE
Scaffold boss fined for fall that happened on his watch


25 October 2012

A scaffolding firm and its director have appeared in court after a worker fell through a fragile rooflight at a warehouse in Kent.

London and South Scaffolding Ltd was contracted to provide scaffold access to the roof at Siemens Windpower Compound at Ramsgate port. The scaffold was required to provide another company with to access to the roof to replace a number of rooflights.

On 12 October last year, scaffold labourer James Froud was part of the London and South Scaffolding team erecting the tower scaffold, under the supervision of the firm’s director, Gary Peck.

Mr Froud, 22, was fitting handrails around a wall on the fragile roof, when he stepped on a rooflight and fell seven metres. He landed on some pallets inside the warehouse and suffered multiple fractures to his spine and pelvis, and spent ten days in hospital. He subsequently needed to wear a back brace for several months.

HSE inspector Caroline Penwill told SHP the company was aware of how fragile the rooflights were but failed to put any measures in place to prevent falls, such as using a MEWP, or erecting staging fitted with guardrails.

“The company and director were aware that the roof and skylights were fragile, but did not take any steps to avoid access to the roof, or provide a safe method of work. Had they done so, James’ fall could have been prevented,” said inspector Penwill.

London and South Scaffolding and Gary Peck appeared at Canterbury Magistrates’ Court on 23 October and both pleaded guilty to breaching regs.4(1)(a), (b), and (c), as well as reg.9(2) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005. The company was fined £10,000 and ordered to pay £1000 in costs. Peck was fined £15,000 and £2000 in costs.

In mitigation, both said they had no previous safety convictions and have subsequently engaged the services of a health and safety consultancy.

After the hearing, inspector Penwill said: “This prosecution underlines that all work at height must be properly planned, supervised, and carried out safely, especially when it involves working on, or near a fragile roof.”


Bob Kennedy


subsequently engaged the services of a health and safety consultancy?

God help us all if the failure of a Scaffolder to determine fragile roof members is to be improved by employment of a consultant.

A truely terrifting thought.

Still maybe he/she can refer him to WAH & Roofing guidance, as Mr Peck clearly missed it previouisly.

This industry is in serious decline, and they gloat endlessly about the great Olympic example.

It is like chalk and chesse. The have`s and have not`s

Posted on 25/10/12 15:43.

paul smith


as caroline said what is wrong with the use of a elevated working platform that had to be the first fought into putting a safety plan together before anybody went near the roof if the company was not sure then they should of hired a safety inspector that works with roofs and a mewp that would of stopped all the problems that accured. a scaffolder is not a safety inspector he errects scaffold you should never think a scaffolder will be able to do a full safety record for you. think on.
 
Just to put our viewpoint across first for the last 8 years we heve banned fragile roof works regardless of our expertise.

second whats a scaff labourer fixing on a roof for ? concern immediately

If management dont want to to accept responsibity for the guys get rid of management
shouldnt be there taking the money & ignoring the work fellas.
 
Last edited:
Just to put our viewpoint across first for the last 8 years we heve banned fragile roof works regardless of our expertise.

second whats a scaff labourer fixing on a roof for ? concern immediately

If management dont want to to accept responsibity for the guys get rid of management
shouldnt be there taking the money & ignoring the work fellas.

+1.
 
i hope mr froud makes a full recovery!! but this bad practice happens everyday not just the small firms but the big ones as well. exspecially when the job occures extra money. the jobs probably been done 300 times without a problem but when the job goes wrong the world knows!! how many work 100% safe on this forum your be lucky if 40% work safe this is the real word
 
I know from experience that Siemens pay a premium for safe practice of works. You could be double the price of your competitor and if your method is safer, you will secure the order for the works. For some company directors, these fines are the only way they will change their attitude towards ensuring their staff go home safely at the end of the day.
 
Top Bottom